Home For Editors and Reviewers Become a Reviewer

Become a Reviewer

Qualifications

Potential reviewers are expected to meet the following qualifications, all of which should be listed in a CV or resume:

  • Expertise in emergency medical services (EMS) or emergency medicine, or expertise in a relevant field (e.g. campus public health, campus public safety, student affairs, education, etc.), or expertise in a specific methodological discipline (e.g. statistics, survey design, etc.).
  • One or more original research publication. This requirement may be waived provided the applicant demonstrates otherwise outstanding academic and scholarly achievement (e.g. published case reports or review articles, significant conference presentations, advanced academic degrees, editorial experience).

Return to Top

Expectations

Reviewers are expected to:

  • Respond to an invitation to review a JCEMS manuscript within 3 days, indicating whether or not the reviewer accepts the invitation.
  • Complete assigned reviews within 14 days of the initial invitation. Notify the editors if the review will not be completed within 14 days.
  • Thoroughly familiarize themselves with JCEMS submission guidelines as detailed in the JCEMS Guide for Authors.
  • Thoroughly familiarize themselves with ethical guidelines for research and publishing as outlined in the JCEMS Guide for Authors.
  • Maintain confidentiality during the review process. Reviewers may not share manuscript details or identify themselves as a reviewer during the review process.
  • Provide an unbiased review. If the reviewer believes that they know the identity of the author, or are otherwise unable to provide an unbiased review, it is the responsibility of the reviewer to contact an Editor.

Return to Top

Benefits

JCEMS reviewers enjoy the following benefits:

  • An annual letter of gratitude written on official JCEMS letterhead for their academic record. The letter will note the number of reviews performed by the reviewer in the preceding year.
  • Annual acknowledgment of the most active reviewers in the print version of JCEMS, with the permission of the acknowledged reviewers.
  • Professional development, establishment of expertise, improvement of scholarly reputation, and contribution to the collegiate EMS community.

Return to Top

Application Process

Reviewers may be invited by the Editor-in-Chief or a designated member of the Editorial Board. In addition, individuals interested in being a reviewer should submit the following items to the Editor-in-Chief at JCEMS@CollegeEMS.com:

  1. CV/resume
  2. Cover letter, detailing their interest and qualifications.
  3. Contact information (email and phone) for three references who can attest to the applicant’s qualifications and expertise. JCEMS prefers that reference(s) are individual(s) with editorial or review experience.
  4. Optional: Letter(s) of recommendation, preferably from individual(s) with editorial or review experience. It is preferred that letters of recommendation be sent directly from the recommender, not the applicant.

Return to Top

Latest

Opioid and Alcohol Co-Ingestion

Although college campuses have historically been regarded as a protective influence against the development of substance use disorders, substance use and misuse have risen to become one of the most widespread public health concerns facing U.S. college campuses in the past decade. This article discusses pertinent pharmacology, clinical presentations, and treatment guidelines for co-ingestion of alcohol and opioids.

Improvements in the Self-Efficacy of CPR Performance Following a Brief Hands-only Training Program for...

Bystander CPR has been shown to significantly improve survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), yet rates of bystander CPR remain low across the United States. This paper outlines a brief HOCPR training that was successfully implemented by a collegiate-based EMS agency.

Ambulance Usage on a Collegiate Campus as a Function of Age and Gender

Bradshaw et al. attempt determine if age and gender exert significant influence on a patient’s decision to utilize ambulatory transport to the emergency department.